Linda*
In 20XX, Linda came to Australia on a temporary student visa.
While living in Australia she met and started dating Steve* who is an Australian citizen. Linda applied for a partner visa, sponsored by Steve.
Linda and Steve had a child together in 20XX.
In 20XX Linda wanted to separate from Steve because she feared for her safety and the safety of their child. This was because Steve:
- wouldn’t allow her to make friends, or speak with her family overseas,
- didn’t allow her to work and controlled all the family’s finances,
- threatened to physically hurt her on numerous occasions, and
- threatened to lock her in the house during the day while he went to work.
When Linda told Steve she wanted to separate, he took her passport and told her he would have her deported and make sure she never saw her child again if she left him.
The neighbours overheard this argument and called the police.
The police put Linda in contact with her local DV service. The DV service arranged an interpreter and helped her to make a safety plan. A safety plan can be about putting a plan in place to stay safe in a relationship, or to stay safe when leaving a relationship. The DV service referred Linda to the TVP for legal advice.
Steve commenced proceedings in the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (“FCFCOA”) seeking parenting orders.
The TVP team provided support to Linda with both her family and migration law needs, including:
1. Notifying the Department of Home Affairs (DHA) that the relationship had ended.
2. Providing evidence to the DHA of the genuineness of the relationship and that Linda and Steve had a child together.
3. Applying for a domestic violence protection order and providing evidence of the family violence Linda experienced to the DHA to support arguments that permanent residency should be granted quickly; and
4. Obtain parenting orders from the FCFCOA that set out the parenting arrangements for their child which included how much time and when the child was to spend time with Steve.
Sarah*
Sarah moved to Australia in 2019 on a student visa. Whilst studying in Australia, Sarah met James* and they started a relationship. They did not apply for a partner visa for Sarah because, at the time, James had not finalised his divorce with his previous partner so was not eligible to be a sponsor.
In February 2021, Sarah and James had a child together.
In January 2023, Sarah applied for and was granted a Temporary Activity Visa (subclass 408). This visa allowed her to remain in Australia until its expiry (1 year from the date when the visa was granted).
During their relationship, Sarah experienced family violence perpetrated by James. In May 2023, the police attended an incident at Sarah and James’ house and issued a police protection notice naming Sarah as the aggrieved and James as the respondent. Following this incident, Sarah and James separated and a magistrate granted a protection order to help protect Sarah.
Sarah’s visa subclass (408) does not entitle her to rely on the family violence provisions, or the child of the relationship provisions. Sarah’s options are limited. She can:
- Apply for a parent visa:
- The granting of parent visas is capped annually.
- Applications are assessed in the order that they are lodged.
- Processing and approval of parent visas can take 12+ years (often more than 30 years) from the date of lodgment.
- There is no bridging visa associated with this application. Sarah would need to apply for a temporary visa to stay in Australia lawfully while the parent visa application is processed.
- Apply for a student visa to continue her studies in Australia:
- Her ability to work to provide for herself and her child would be limited.
- This does not provide a permanent solution.
- Apply for a skilled visa (if she has eligible skills or occupations).
- Return to her home country:
- With the child: Tensions with Australian family law.
- Without the child: Risk of alienation from her child.
*Names and identifying information changed to maintain client privacy and confidentiality